Scientists argue that high-yield livestock is wrongly blamed for the increased risk of the pandemic

It is not inside livestock farmingor the so-called “intensive” Farming increases the risk of pandemics – quite the opposite. An important study by veterinarians and ecologists found that outdoor and “free range” animal husbandry may increase the risk of animal-borne pandemics. Instead, the ability to continue producing animals indoors with controlled conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity, ventilation) may comparatively reduce the risk of pandemics and the emergence of dangerous diseases, including Sars, BSE, bird flu and Covid-19 less intensive agriculture.

According to the authors of the study, published in the scientific journal Royal Society Open Science, limited animal husbandry is less risky because animals are protected and easier to monitor. You have less chance of coming into contact with wild animals and therefore less risk of releasing dangerous viruses. Despite reports from the United Nations and other organizations that would like to link “intensive animal husbandry” to the spread of zoonoses, the authors argue that “not intense‘ or ‘low-yield farming’ much more earth to produce the same amount of food, and this causes habitat loss. In addition, it displaces disease-carrying wild animals such as bats and rodents, bringing them closer to livestock and humans.

As Harriet Bartlettthe study’s lead author, claims: “Intensive or high-yield livestock farming is blamed for pandemics, but this is often overlooked by those calling for a shift away from intensive farming pandemic risk of less intensive agriculture and, above all, the consequences for land use. Low-yield farms require much more land to produce the same food than high-yield farms. Widespread conversion to low-yield agriculture would destroy and disrupt vast tracts of land natural habitats. On the one hand, this increases the risk of a viral spillover Transmission from a wild animalby disrupting wildlife that may be harboring the next pandemic virus and increasing contact between wildlife, humans and livestock.”

“low-yield farms typically include larger livestock, worse biosecurity, more workers and more agricultural land, resulting in different, but not necessarily lower, disease risks than higher-yielding systems that produce the same amount of food,” read the report by veterinarians and ecologists from the Universities of Cambridge and Leeds. “A global one Moving away from intensive farming would need an area almost the size of Indiainevitably the increase danger of overflows. The conversion and fragmentation of natural habitats means we farm in places where livestock and humans can come into closer contact with stressed wildlife populations,” says Bartlett.

professor Joseph PulinaPresident of “Carni Sostenibili” and one of the top 1000 animal scientists in the world, stated: “Paradoxically Confining animals offers a very high level of security. On the contrary, outdoor animals are most exposed to this disease, especially if they have no active defenses, double fences and no active defenses constant serological control. On the other hand, the animals on the farm have such a high level of safety that if the disease entered the farm, it would be known immediately. So the farm would immediately be considered an outbreak, with the quick intervention of the health authorities“.

Learn Crypto Trading, Yield Farms, Income strategies and more at CrytoAnswers
https://nov.link/cryptoanswers