It is not yet the law of the country, but one of the potentially most powerful aspects of the bipartisan infrastructure law for climates is the foundation for new economic opportunities based on the capture and sequencing of carbon emissions.
Support for the so-called carbon management economy takes many forms within the bill and is largely based on the SCALE bill, which was reintroduced earlier this year by senators on both sides of the aisle. (SCALE stands for save CO2 and reduce emissions). Some of the largest monetary data points are:
- More than $ 8.5 billion in funding for industrial and direct air-to-carbon capture technologies, including not just equipment to extract CO2, but transportation networks and pipelines to get them to where they’re stored can be.
- A pool of 3.5 billion US dollars to create four regional hubs for Direct Air Capture (DAC), each of which can extract at least 1 million tons of CO2 annually (in perspective, these are the emissions from around 120,000 US households be generated).
- About $ 2.5 billion over the next five years to help the Department of Energy create storage facilities for the captured carbon – not just in geological formations, but also in products like cement and plastic.
Analysis by the Bipartisan Policy Center, the Clean Air Task Force, and Third Way estimates that this type of policy could create thousands of U.S. jobs – up to 13,000 annually, without the employment potential associated with retrofitting industrial factories or building DACs -Investments. Before it was passed, the Carbon Capture Coalition orchestrated a statement of support for infrastructure investments and improvements to the 45Q tax regime, which incentivizes companies to build carbon capture facilities. (The letter is signed by more than 170 organizations from transportation companies like United Airlines to unions like United Steelworkers and infrastructure companies like LafargeHolcim and Honeywell.)
[Want more great analysis of climate tech and innovation? Sign up for VERGE Weekly, our free email newsletter.]
“The adoption of the bipartisan infrastructure regulations and the key complementary tax measures outlined in the letter could lead to a macroeconomic rollout that would result in an estimated 13-fold increase in CO2 management capacity and annual emissions reductions of 210-250 million tons 2045 would lead to innovation and improved performance while reducing costs and maintaining and creating high-wage jobs that families and communities across the country rely on, “coalition director Brad Crabtree said in a statement.
To help me think about the impact of the pending legislation, especially alongside the IPCC’s new assessment of where the world stands on climate change, I spoke to experts from the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the Clean Air Task Force (CATF.) to chat ). I asked them, among other things, to respond to criticism from some environmental groups who are skeptical about how much money to invest in carbon capture, which could be seen as a continuation of the continued use of fossil fuels.
Even if we eliminated fossil fuels overnight, we would still need these things.
Dan Lashof, director of WRI for the United States, said rapid approval for carbon capture centers, as well as the infrastructure needed to get captured CO2 to places where it can be managed, is critical to achieving the Parisian goals Agreement are. He pointed to the strong support for the infrastructure for CO2 capture and storage by the International Energy Agency as well as accelerated investments in solar and wind power plants as one reason for the importance of this investment. “Even if we eliminated fossil fuels overnight, we would still need these things,” Lashof told me.
Lee Beck, international director of carbon capture at CATF, said reaching the levels of carbon removal needed to limit global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius by 2050 would mean building thousands of facilities in the United States that will feed into networks that can benefit from cost sharing. This is the approach used in Europe in Norway’s emerging carbon capture and storage project, Northern Lights, supported by Shell, Total and Equinor. Industrial plants across the region have committed to transporting captured CO2 to the site. It is possible that a similar model could emerge in the US, Beck suggested. The cluster effect is already occurring in places like Texas, Nebraska, North Dakota, and Illinois.
In addition to the infrastructure plans, a decisive success factor is the further development of the federal government’s 45Q tax incentives. “The way we are approaching the crisis is a very technology-driven way,” she said. “Innovation alone is not enough.”
Changes advocated in the Carbon Capture Coalition letter include a direct payment option for the incentive that helps those who are federal tax exempt, a 10 year extension of the facility construction window, and an increase in loan values, including the one Ranges from $ 60 to $ 130 per ton, depending on collection and storage methods.
All of these ideas are, of course, purely hypothetical until the bill (along with the proposed massive $ 3.5 trillion budget that includes even more climate technology and infrastructure measures) is examined and passed by the US House of Representatives and President Joe Biden signed. This body is scheduled to return to Washington DC in late August, so that could take weeks.
[Continue the dialogue at VERGE 21: the climate tech event. Register here to join more than 10,000 leaders, Oct. 25-28.]