Identifying ways to make pig production more sustainable: trade-offs and co-benefits of using land and antibiotics
Herrero, M., Thornton, PK, Gerber, P. & Reid, RS Livestock, Livelihoods, and the Environment: Understanding the Tradeoffs. act. Opinion. Vicinity. Receive. 1, 111-120 (2009).
Foley, JA et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).
Gerber, PJ et al. Tackling climate change through livestock farming – A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food Agricultural. Organ. UN (FAO) Rome https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.074 (2013).
Xu, X. et al. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice as high as those from plant-based foods. nat. Essen 2, 724-732 (2021).
Landers TF, Cohen B, Wittum TE & Larson EL A review of antibiotic use in livestock: perspective, policy and potential. Public Health Rep. 127, 4-22 (2012).
Van Boeckel, TP et al. Reducing the use of antimicrobials in livestock. Science (80-) 357, 1350–1352 (2017).
Henchion, M., Moloney, `, Hyland, J., Zimmermann, J. & McCarthy, S. Review: Meat, dairy, and egg consumption trends for the next few decades and the role that livestock systems play in global protein production . Tier 15, 100287 (2021).
Lassaletta, L. et al. Future global pig production systems according to the common socio-economic pathways. Science. overall environment. 665, 739-751 (2019).
Mehrabi, Z., Gill, M., van Wijk, M., Herrero, M. & Ramankutty, N. Livestock Policy for Sustainable Development. nat. Essen 1(3), 160-165 (2020).
Godfray, CJH et al. Meat consumption, health and the environment. Science 361, eaam5324 (2018).
Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing the Environmental Impact of Food by Producers and Consumers. Science (80-) 360, 987–992 (2018).
Balmford, A. et al. The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming. nat. Receive. 1, 477-485 (2018).
Resare Sahlin, K., Röös, E. & Gordon, LJ “Less but better” Meat is a sustainability message that needs clarification. nat. Food 1(9), 520–522 (2020).
van Zanten, HHE, Mollenhorst, H., Klootwijk, CW, van Middelaar, CE & de Boer, IJM Global food supply: land-use efficiency of livestock systems. international J. Life Cycle Assessment. 21, 747-758 (2016).
Roos, E. et al. Greedy or needy? Land use and climate impacts of food in 2050 among different animal husbandries. global Vicinity. change. Guideline Dimensions 47, 1–12 (2017).
Lipsitch, M., Singer, RS & Levin, BR Antibiotics in agriculture: when is it time to close the barn door?. Proc. Natl. Academic Science. USA 99 , 5752-5754 (2002).
Balmford, A. Concentrating rather than spreading our footprint: How to meet humanity’s needs at the least cost to nature. J Zool. 315, 79-109 (2021).
Searchinger, TD, Wirsenius, S., Beringer, T. & Dumas, P. Assessing the efficiency of land-use change to mitigate climate change. Nature 564, 249–253 (2018).
Ye, X. et al. Livestock-associated methicillin and human multidrug-resistant S. aureus are associated with swine occupational exposure, not domestic exposure. Science. Rep. 6, 1-9 (2016).
Google Scholar
Laxminarayan, R. et al. Antimicrobial resistance – the need for global solutions. infect the lancet. Dis. 13, 1057-1098 (2013).
Murray, CJ et al. Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance in 2019: A Systematic Analysis. Lancet 399, 629-655 (2022).
Smith DL, Harris AD, Johnson JA, Silbergeld EK & Morris JG Antibiotic use in animals has an early but important impact on the emergence of antibiotic resistance in human commensal bacteria. Proc. Natl. Academic Science. USA 99 , 6434-6439 (2002).
Albernaz-Gonçalves, R., Antillón, GO & Hötzel, MJ Linking animal welfare and antibiotic use in pig farming – an overview. Animals 12, 1–21 (2022).
Elliott, KA, Kenny, C. & Madan, J. A global agreement to reduce antimicrobial use in livestock. Cent. global Developers 102, 27 (2017).
Google Scholar
Van Boeckel, TP et al. Global trends in antimicrobial use in livestock. Proc. Natl. Academic Science. 112, 5649-5654 (2015).
Kalmar, L. et al. HAM-ART: An optimized culture-free Hi-C metagenomics pipeline to trace antimicrobial resistance genes in complex microbial communities. PLoS Genet. 18, e1009776 (2021).
Zhu, YG et al. Diverse and abundant antibiotic resistance genes in Chinese pig farms. Proc. Natl. Academic Science. USA 110, 3435-3440 (2013).
Tiseo K, Huber L, Gilbert M, Robinson TP & Van Boeckel TP Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals from 2017 to 2030. Antibiotics 9, 1–14 (2020).
Rushton, J. et al. Antimicrobial resistance the use of antimicrobial agents in livestock farming. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jxvl3dwk3f0-en (2014)
Gonzalez-Mejia, A., Styles, D., Wilson, P. & Gibbons, J. Metrics and methods for characterizing dairy farm intensification using farm survey data. Plus One https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195286 (2018).
Struik, PC & Kuyper, TW Sustainable intensification in agriculture: The richer shade of green. A review. Agron. Receive. Developers 37, 1-15 (2017).
Vissers, LSM, Saatkamp, HW & Oude Lansink, AGJM Analysis of synergies and trade-offs between animal welfare, ammonia emission, particulate matter emission and antibiotic use in Dutch broiler production systems. agricultural. system 189, 103070 (2021).
Garnett, T. et al. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: prerequisites and policy. Science (81-) 341, 33-34 (2013).
Bright-Ponte, SJ Data collection on antimicrobial use in animal husbandry. Zoonoses Public Health 67, 1–5 (2020).
Price, LB, Koch, BJ & Hungate, BA Ominous predictions for the global use of antibiotics in food and animal production. Proc. Natl. Academic Science. USA 112, 5554-5555 (2015).
Marshall, BM & Levy, SB Livestock and Antimicrobials: Impact on Human Health. Clinical Microbiol. Rev. 24, 718-733 (2011).
EMA. Categorization of antibiotics in the European Union. EUR. Med. Agency 31, 73 (2019).
Google Scholar
Vellinga, TV et al. in Title Methodology used in FeedPrint: a tool to quantify greenhouse gas emissions from feed production and use. http://www.livestockresearch.wur.nl (2013).
Benjamins, D. in Oxford Sandy & Black Pigs as a Method of Weed Control. When do they stop being an asset and start becoming a problem? (2002).
Henney, J. in a dissertation An evaluation of the use of pigs as a bracken control method. (2012).
Espinosa, R., Tago, D. & Treich, N. Infectious diseases and meat production. Vicinity. Resource. econ. 76, 1019-1044 (2020).
Gilbert, W., Thomas, LF, Coyne, L. & Rushton, J. Review: Mitigating Risks by Intensifying Animal Production: Examples of Antimicrobial Resistance and Zoonoses. Tier 15, 100123 (2021).
DEFRA. UK monthly statistics for slaughter and meat production of cattle, sheep and pigs – Statistical Communication (data to March 2022) – GOV.UK. 2022 https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/cattle-sheep-and-pig-slaughter/monthly-uk-statistics-on-cattle-sheep-and-pig-slaughter-and-meat-production-statistics -notification-dates-until-february-2022.
Driver, A. Highlighting the differences – How UK welfare standards compare to our peers. PIG WORLD (2017).
DEFRA. in Code of Conduct for the Welfare of PIGS © National Pig Association. www.gov.uk/defra (2020).
Red Tractor. pig standards. 17-19 (2017).
QMS. 2020 standards for pigs. www.gov.uk/animal-welfare-in-severe-weather%0A. https://assurance.redtractor.org.uk/contentfiles/Farmers-6801.pdf?_=636504999253492650 (2019).
RSPCA. RSPCA Pig Welfare Standards. (2016).
ground dressing. Soil Association organic standards for agriculture and cultivation. Farming and Growing Organic Standards www.soilassociation.org/organicstandards (2016).
Organic Food Association. Production standards of the Association for Organic Food. (2016).
Moakes S, Lampkin N & Gerrard CL Organic Farm Income in England and Wales 2010/11 (OF 0373). (2012).
Hossard, L. et al. A meta-analysis of maize and wheat yields in low-input vs. conventional and organic systems. Agron. J. 108, 1155-1167 (2016).
De Ponti, T., Rijk, B. & Van Ittersum, MK The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture. agricultural. system 108, 1-9 (2012).
FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (2022).
EMA. Principles for assigning a defined daily dose for animals (DDDvet) and a defined course dose for animals (DCDvet). 44, 68 (2015).
Ogle, D., Doll, J., Wheeler, P. & Dinno, A. “FSA” package. (2022).
Kassambara, A. Ggpubr: “Ggplot2” based publish-ready plots. (2021).
Mangiafico, S. Package ‘rcompanion’. (2022).
Arnold, JB Package ‘ggthemes’. (2021).
Pedersen, T.L. Patchwork: The Composer of Plots. Crane (2020).
Wickham, H. et al. ggplot2 package. (2021).
Learn Crypto Trading, Yield Farms, Income strategies and more at CrytoAnswers
https://nov.link/cryptoanswers
Comments are closed.