Why is the Adani-Hindenburg affair a matter of public interest? Neeraj Grover explains at an event organized by the Alternative Law Forum – The Leaflet

Grover also explained the government’s role in managing financial markets, which either exacerbates or reduces wealth inequality in the country.

—-

THE Understanding the financial markets and issues related to Hindenburg Research, Adani and the volatility of stocks, shares and trading have political and societal relevance, emphasized Neeraj Grover, Assistant Professor of Law, Azim Premji University, at an event organized by the Alternative Law Forum on Friday.

Grover emphasized that the allocation and redistribution of resources that widen or close the inequality gap between rich and poor depend on government accountability and how it manages financial markets. “The cooperation of the state with the markets widens or closes the gap of inequality,” he emphasized.

Grover made a connection between the state and financial markets, explaining that the role of the state and how it shapes inequality through the use and deployment of markets is important in understanding the root cause of economic marginalization in our society, since markets lead to inequality.

mechanism of financial markets

Grover went over the basics of how financial markets work, saying that markets refer to platforms where stocks are sold and bought. He referred to the mechanism of a vital institution or actor in the financial markets, namely a corporation.

He went on to say that a corporation or company is a large institution that accumulates large amounts of capital and essentially consists of people who contribute to its financial capital. A company’s capital is brought in by banks, who are creditors, or other smaller lenders, and by shareholders on the promise that they will receive a prorated amount of the profits the company makes.

Grover explained that a company has the potential to accumulate resources. “It allows for the mobilization and collection of financial and human resources under its own identity and has the potential to mobilize wealth,” he said. Understanding how corporations work helps answer certain questions – how a vast chunk of wealth is being used to create more wealth, who is holding the people who manage wealth to account, and the role of government in distributing and distributing it Redistribution of wealth plays a role, Grover explained.

According to Grover, corporations allow for the separation of ownership and control of wealth. Grover presented an analysis and said that even if shareholders are the ones who contribute to that capital, they aren’t the ones who control the wealth — the wealth is controlled by managers, directors and such other names.

However, companies in Asia have this unique quality where people who manage the capital have also contributed to the capital, Grover pointed out. These companies are family run and in most of these companies the family itself contributes and manages the capital. When they contribute to the fund, they also receive contributions from the general public.

Adani group

Grover drew attention to the company of the multinational conglomerate Adani Group and explained that 75 percent of the assets of the Adani Group are owned by the Adani family. While the company owns 75 percent of the capital and co-opts the remaining 25 percent to the public, it alone controls 100 percent of the funds because it is a family business.

Grover went on to explain that Adani’s shares are up 800 percent over the past three years, which is highly unusual for any company in the financial market. Regarding the consequences of the stock price increase for the Adani family, Grover stated that the stock increase is related to the Adani family’s personal wealth due to the fact that the family not only contributes money but also acts as manager of the prices has the family’s net worth around increased to $100 billion.

Hindenburg research

Grover explained that the report on the Adani Group released by investment research firm Hindenburg Research on Jan. 24 made two claims. First, it claimed that demand for Adani’s shares had been artificially inflated, leading to an artificial rise in prices. Second, Hindenburg claimed that Adani’s ownership structure flouted Indian law by holding more than 75 percent of the company’s shares through “shady companies.” This obfuscation of actual ownership is known as “round-tripping.”

Grover emphasized that Hindenburg Research is a self-serving company that profits from its reports and published the Adani report with non-altruistic intentions.

matter of public interest

Grover linked the findings of the Hindenburg research report to the need for accountability and transparency in India’s financial markets, noting that the Adani family had a history of persecution. He added that a 2007 investigation by the Securities and Exchange Board of India also found that the company artificially inflated its prices and banned some of its promoters from the securities market for two years.

Grover explained that the Adani-Hindenberg affair affects the public interest in two ways. First, when a company as large as Adani Group primarily intends to benefit one party, it calls into question the integrity of our financial markets. It raises concerns about the transparency of wealth accumulation in the country and perpetuates inequality by blocking wealth from others. Second, in the war between the two self-interested parties – Hindenberg Research and Adani Group – the 25 percent of public funds are lost. “The losers are not those who control the wealth, but those who contribute it,” Grover concluded.