A U.S. appeals court has slammed the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for its unfair reasoning for denying approval for a Bitcoin cash ETF in the Grayscale case. This decision has far-reaching implications, not only for the democratization of cryptocurrency investments, but also for the framework of regulatory governance of digital assets. We’ll come back to this in the cryptanalysis after this week’s major news.
Block 1: Important news
X, formerly known as Twitter, has received a Rhode Island license to offer cryptocurrency-related services, including exchanges and digital wallets. The exact details of what X intends to do with this license are not yet clear, as neither the platform nor Elon Musk have provided any details on the matter. It’s also unclear if this license will allow X to operate throughout the US or just Rhode Island. However, X has already integrated the ability to make donations in bitcoins, showing its level of openness about crypto assets.
- India supports the development of cryptocurrencies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has called for the democratization and adoption of cryptocurrencies, stressing that it is “pointless to try to curb their development”. Modi advocates harmonized global regulation, including for the countries of the South, and points out that these assets could offer new economic opportunities to emerging countries. This stance comes against the backdrop of the BRICS+ meetings and India’s current G20 presidency.
- Hong Kong is developing blockchain bonds
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has released a positive report on the $102 million green bond tokenization carried out in February as part of its Evergreen project. The report highlights the potential of distributed ledger technology (DLT) to improve the efficiency, liquidity and transparency of bond markets. For this project, HKMA used Hyperledger Besu and Canton, technologies that enable blockchain programming and interoperability. HKMA also states that it will continue to work with market participants to explore other blockchain applications.
- Ethereum is in good shape
Staking on the Ethereum blockchain is growing in popularity, with over 24 million ETH (20% of the total supply) currently being staked to secure the network. Since Ethereum switched to proof-of-stake consensus almost a year ago, the number of validators has increased by almost 35%. Despite a slowdown in on-chain activity and a drop in ETH price, the stakes remain solid, offering an annual return of around 3.7%. This data suggests that Ethereum’s health is resilient even in a complicated market.
Number of ethers used in the network
Beaconcha.in
Block 2: Cryptanalysis of the week
The United States may be one step closer to approving a Bitcoin Spot Exchange Traded Fund (ETF), considered the Holy Grail of financial products backed by the untouchable Bitcoin. On Tuesday, the US Circuit Court of Appeals, headed by a trio of judges, overturned the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s (SEC) arguments that had systematically rejected proposals for spot ETFs on BTC in the Grayscale case. The court concluded that the SEC had acted “arbitrarily” and “capriciously,” reflecting an opinion long expressed by the cryptosphere’s most ardent supporters.
Specifically, the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia sided with Grayscale Investments, the world’s largest Bitcoin manager with 635,000 BTC under management, in its lawsuit against the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
Who Owns How Many Bitcoins?
bitcointreasuries.net
This Court of Appeals decision paves the way for the conversion of Grayscale’s flagship product, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC), into an ETF. Essentially, the court asked the SEC to reevaluate Grayscale’s ETF application and urged the US Securities and Exchange Commission to provide more compelling and justifiable reasons should it decide to deny the proposal again. Below is an interview with Grayscale’s CEO on the subject.
Following this decision, crypto-asset enthusiasts were excited, not only because of a possible conversion of the GBTC into a bitcoin cash ETF, but also because of the court’s explicit criticism of the SEC. The regulator’s “inability to meet its own standards, coupled with its inability to sufficiently rationalize its decisions,” drew widespread anger. In particular, the SEC failed to explain why it approved certain bitcoin-related financial products, particularly those based on futures contracts, while disapproving others.
The SEC’s approach is all the more questionable as it appears to ignore key data, such as the near-identical behavior of the bitcoin spot and futures markets — both markets show a 99% positive correlation. On the other hand, the impact of this decision on current ETF applications, especially after the surprise entry of investment giant BlackRock, remains unclear. In other words, this SEC setback doesn’t necessarily mean that all bitcoin cash ETFs will be accepted. The US Securities and Exchange Commission could find new explanations for denial of ETF approval in the future.
But this legal step has a double effect.
First, ETF acceptance could lead to billions of dollars in cryptocurrency investments flowing through regulated, traditional exchange platforms. It would also give many people who still have reservations about opening accounts on Binance and Coinbase a chance to get hands-on with Bitcoin.
Additionally, the decision undermines the perception of the SEC’s omnipotence in the crypto space. After July’s landmark Ripple case, it’s clear that the agency doesn’t necessarily have the final say on the legal interpretation of digital assets; A role that the US judiciary and possibly Congress can also play. This point is even more important given SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s claim that almost all cryptocurrencies, with the exception of Bitcoin, fall under SEC regulation.
This comes as lawmakers are actively debating the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Bill, which challenges the SEC’s jurisdiction over digital assets. The bill suggests that cryptocurrencies could be better regulated by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) due to their nature as “commodity-like” entities. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS), on the other hand, treats cryptocurrencies as property. In other words, things are not quite so clear cut.
Currently, cryptocurrencies are digital cash, securities, commodities, and property, but they are also tools that symbolize libertarian, progressive, and apolitical movements. Presenting itself as the intersection of a cutting-edge financial architecture, the cryptocurrency ecosystem is disrupting traditional finance with its allure and inconsistency with Wall Street. Against this complex backdrop, the question arises: should the SEC be the sole custodian of the destiny of the cryptocurrency world? Be continued…
Block 3: winners and losers
crypto chart
(click to enlarge)
Block 4: Readings this week
Exposing Trickbot, one of the world’s leading cybercrime gangs (Wired)
Regulation, Not Crypto, Is Broken (Project Syndicate)
SEC Strikes Crypto Again (WSJ)
Investors are flocking to Crypto IA startups (The Informations)
Comments are closed.