The good news is that everything delivered positive returns, even if there were big differences. The Japanese stock market was the worst-performing stock index, registering a change of just 4.5 percent between 2006 and 2007, while emerging markets posted huge returns. China’s stock markets rose 200 percent over the same period.
This, in turn, had a positive impact on returns in markets such as Mexico, Brazil, Hong Kong, South Korea and Japan. Germany was the best-performing Western stock market – even as European interest rates rose – reflecting the impact of Chinese demand for German-made goods such as cars.
4:50 p.m
Can China learn lessons from Japan’s “lost 30 years”?
Can China learn lessons from Japan’s “lost 30 years”?
The core markets of the USA and Europe developed reasonably well. Both the S&P 500 and the Euro Stoxx rose by around 20 percent – perhaps fears of recession were not so widespread back then.
European government bonds, including UK government bonds, posted positive returns; Returns were in the 4 to 5 percent range and the majority of returns came from income.
The International Monetary Fund’s World Economic Outlook of September 2006 predicted that the U.S. economy would grow by 3.4 percent in 2006 and 2.9 percent in 2007, and that the Eurozone would grow by 2.4 percent and 2.0 percent, respectively. A growth rate of 10 percent was forecast for China.
The US Federal Reserve needs to watch its move as recession risks loom
There were strong growth expectations, which benefited the stock markets – a clear difference to the current situation. Current growth forecasts suggest that major economies will face a recession in 2024 and that China will continue to struggle Balance sheet problems.
What lessons can we learn from this time? We do not know how long interest rates will remain at the peak and whether this is actually the peak. But the central scenario is that they remain on hold until data suggests the economy is weakening and inflation is back under control.
The first lesson is that monetary policy can change quickly. The non-linear nature of higher interest rates results in a weaker real estate market and a global financial crisis was not in the outlook of the Federal Open Market Committee in mid-2007. However, when the Fed began cutting interest rates, it cut them quickly and forcefully.
Therefore, a negative outcome of this cycle cannot be ruled out. There may be a period ahead when risk assets will significantly underperform.
There are rhymes in history. Because short-term interest rates are high and yield curves are inverted, it is difficult for longer-dated bonds to deliver significantly more than their yield.
The growth prospects for the stock markets are weaker today than they were back then. China is sputtering, leaving the world with one less important factor in stock performance compared to the mid-2000s, when globalization had not yet fallen out of favor. The prolonged period of high interest rates in 2006 and 2007 was followed by a two-year period of tightening by the Fed. But stock returns have generally been positive.
This time, with similar interest rates but weaker growth, it could be more difficult for core equity markets to achieve a 20 percent return.
Interestingly, global stocks have posted negative returns of more than 6 percent since the Fed hiked interest rates to 5.25-5.50 percent on July 26. This is a different path than it was in 2006. Leveraged growth was a popular idea then, but not so much today.
The second lesson is that monetary policy works at some point and central banks can’t really control how that plays out.
Monetary policy tightening hit the U.S. housing market and then the financial system in 2007, and its effects intensified in 2008. It eventually led to a sharp decline in U.S. growth in 2009. Inflation collapsed and turned negative, and the country’s unemployment rate shot up 10 percent cents. The Fed had to cut interest rates dramatically in 2008 to 0.25 percent, where they remained until the end of 2015.
If the Fed’s current monetary cycle follows a similar pattern and interest rates remain unchanged through mid-2024, the long-looming recession could come in late 2024 or early 2025, with risk assets going through a significant period of underperformance and long-dated bonds performing well above that Trending returns. This could be the global economy’s last visit to Table Mountain, at least for now.
Chris Iggo is Chairman of the AXA Investment Managers Investment Institute and Chief Investment Officer of AXA IM Core
Comments are closed.