The G7 may need to turn to a new group: emerging economies. The April World Economic Outlook from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) states: “The global economy is increasingly influenced by the major emerging economies of the Group of Twenty. Over the last two decades, these economies have become much more integrated into global markets, generating greater economic “spillover” effects to the rest of the world.” Even in a world where we have all accepted that change is the only constant and Although we have become accustomed to the IMF recanting its position on “truths” such as the convertibility of capital accounts as a necessity and the need for fiscal austerity, the IMF's statement is a revelation shedding light on what has long been taken for granted in the global context is true, namely that spillover effects only occur in one direction: from the industrialized countries to the emerging countries. So, while the 2008 global financial crisis that originated in the United States impacted countries around the world, crises such as the East Asian Crisis of 1997 or the Latin American Crisis of the 1980s primarily affected other emerging economies – typically around the country, that was at the center of the problem in Latin America, while the East Asian crisis affected the “Asian Tigers”, with advanced economies either unaffected or only slightly affected.
The G7 may need to turn to a new group: emerging economies. The April World Economic Outlook from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) states: “The global economy is increasingly influenced by the major emerging economies of the Group of Twenty. Over the last two decades, these economies have become much more integrated into global markets, generating greater economic “spillover” effects to the rest of the world.” Even in a world where we have all accepted that change is the only constant and Although we have become accustomed to the IMF recanting its position on “truths” such as the convertibility of capital accounts as a necessity and the need for fiscal austerity, the IMF's statement is a revelation shedding light on what has long been taken for granted in the global context is true, namely that spillover effects only occur in one direction: from the industrialized countries to the emerging countries. So, while the 2008 global financial crisis that originated in the United States impacted countries around the world, crises such as the East Asian Crisis of 1997 or the Latin American Crisis of the 1980s primarily affected other emerging economies – typically around the country, that was at the center of the problem in Latin America, while the East Asian crisis affected the “Asian Tigers”, with advanced economies either unaffected or only slightly affected.
We are not just talking about crises, which naturally have spillover effects, but also about the domestic macro policies of large economies. The legacy of the Bretton Woods Conference established the US dollar as the international reserve currency. The resulting “exorbitant privilege” of the US dollar means that the world’s largest economy can easily finance large deficits because its government bonds are readily bought by other countries. Worse, any change in U.S. policy has spillover effects on the rest of the world, as shown by the “taper tantrum” of 2013, when U.S. Treasury yields soared after the Federal Reserve said it would slowing the pace of their bond purchases will have a severe impact on emerging market currencies that could almost lead to a tsunami. For example, the Indian rupee depreciated ₹55.80 per dollar on May 24th ₹65.24 as of September 6, 2013, even as the Reserve Bank of India sold $14 billion net in June-September to keep its decline in order. “Growth spillovers from domestic shocks in G20 emerging economies have increased over the past two decades,” says the WEO, “and are now comparable to those in advanced economies.” As expected, the largest spillovers are for emerging economies attributed to China. These explain the differences in production in emerging countries as well as in the USA. It is well known that the rise of China has led to a shift in balance within the G20. But here's the surprise: other G20 emerging economies – such as India, Brazil, Russia and Mexico – also play an important role in the economic performance of their neighbors.
Hello! You are reading a premium article! Subscribe now to continue reading.
Subscribe now
Already subscribed? Registration
Premium benefits
35+ Premium Articles every day
Specially curated Newsletter daily
access to 15+ print edition Articles every day
Webinar for subscribers only by specialist journalists
E-paper, archives, select Articles in the Wall Street Journal and the Economist
Access to special offers for subscribers only: Infographics and podcasts
Unlock 35+ well-researched games
Premium items every day
Access global insights with
Over 100 exclusive items from
International publications
Get free access to
3+ investment based apps
TRENDLYNE
Get one month GuruQ plan for 1 rupees
Finology
Free Finologie subscription for 1 month.
SMALL CASE
20% discount on all small cases
Newsletter only for 5+ subscribers
specially curated by experts
Free access to e-paper and
WhatsApp updates
We are not just talking about crises, which naturally have spillover effects, but also about the domestic macro policies of large economies. The legacy of the Bretton Woods Conference established the US dollar as the international reserve currency. The resulting “exorbitant privilege” of the US dollar means that the world’s largest economy can easily finance large deficits because its government bonds are readily bought by other countries. Worse, any change in U.S. policy has spillover effects on the rest of the world, as shown by the “taper tantrum” of 2013, when U.S. Treasury yields soared after the Federal Reserve said it would slowing the pace of their bond purchases will have a severe impact on emerging market currencies that could almost lead to a tsunami. For example, the Indian rupee depreciated ₹55.80 per dollar on May 24th ₹65.24 as of September 6, 2013, even as the Reserve Bank of India sold $14 billion net in June-September to keep its decline in check. “Growth spillover effects from domestic shocks in G20 emerging economies have increased over the past two decades,” says the WEO, “and are now comparable to those in advanced economies.” As would be expected, the largest spillover effects come from the emerging economies of China. These explain the differences in production in emerging countries as well as in the USA. It is well known that the rise of China has led to a shift in balance within the G20. But here's the surprise: other G20 emerging economies – such as India, Brazil, Russia and Mexico – also play an important role in the economic performance of their neighbors.
We can imagine this new normal as sweet revenge for all the decades in which emerging economies were the victims. But that would be self-defeating. In a globalized world, we sink or swim together. Spillovers are inevitable. And while it may be naive to believe that each country shapes its policies with global rather than national fundamentals in mind, we must aim to work together to minimize the downside of spillovers.
Get all business news, market news, breaking news and breaking news updates on Live Mint. Download the Mint News App to receive daily market updates.
Comments are closed.